Neuroimaging  ·  Computational Methods  ·  Brain Health

VaidehiPatel

A researcher who builds. An engineer who investigates.

Bachelor's in Computer Engineering taught me to understand systems — how they're built, where they fail, what the architecture is actually doing beneath the surface. A brain injury and four years in medical device manufacturing pulled me toward neuroscience. Master's in Cognitive Neuroscience is where that engineering instinct and personal curiosity finally met the right problem. The combination is rarer than either alone — and it shows up in the work.

150+
Thesis downloads
across 10 countries
139
sessions — including TBI and controls (manuscript)
20K+
Cortical points
per subject
42×
FreeSurfer throughput
via parallel batching
Scroll to explore
My Journey

I’m a Computer Engineer turned Neuroscientist. This shift didn’t happen suddenly, but through a slow accumulation of questions I had no framework to answer yet. I was working at a medical device company during COVID-19 when the pandemic stillness gave me time to learn neuroanatomy— finally addressing the questions left over from my own traumatic brain injury a few years prior. I attended online neuroscience conferences and took beginner courses, thinking it was just a phase that would pass once my curiosity was satisfied.

Then, one book changed everything: My Stroke of Insight by Jill Bolte Taylor. It featured a neuroscientist narrating her own stroke— experiencing from the inside what she had only ever studied from the outside. Becoming the observed instead of the observer. Something shifted in how I understood my own injury and recovery. The fuel for my curiosity stopped being "why me" and became something more useful: ensuring that one day, someone else going through something similar doesn't have to feel the way I did.

Mere advocacy and volunteering felt insufficient when my own recovery pointed directly at gaps in how the field understood the injury. The trial-and-error of medications and the sense of being "managed" rather than understood created a frustration that could only be resolved by what I CAN DO for this problem. That drove everything that followed: a mission to transform one of the worst things that happened to me into one of the best things I could do for others.

Clinical recovery may have returned me to a "normal" life, but never to the feeling of being fully restored. I realized full recovery isn’t measured by the clinical absence of impairment, but by the reclamation of one’s potential— the very thing I had abandoned the moment I woke up in the ICU. The space provided by the pandemic finally allowed me the room to grieve that loss and, ultimately, to find a reprieve.

I began seeking out researchers who approached these questions methodically. That path led me to one of the few MS programs in Cognitive Neuroscience in the U.S., where I focused on mapping the brain's neurovascular system after moderate-to-severe TBI. My thesis produced one of the first surface-based CBF-fALFF neurovascular coupling (NVC) analyses in TBI at hemisphere and vertex-neighborhood scales.

As a Research Assistant, I scaled that thesis into a longitudinal, multi-scale NVC analysis. I built an end-to-end pipeline across five nested spatial scales: whole-brain, hemisphere, Yeo-7 networks, DKT atlas regions, and vertex neighborhoods. The investigation grew finer with each scale, answering what the previous one couldn't. A journal manuscript for this work is currently in preparation.

TBI is where I built my proof of work, but it is not the ceiling. Once I understand a system clearly enough to simplify the scales of looking at it, the transferability of skills to problem-solve is inevitable. I am drawn to any hard problem at the intersection of how the brain works and how we build systems to understand or augment it [be it biological, computational, rehabilitative].

DegreeM.S. Cognitive Neuroscience, CUNY
PriorB.E. Computer Engineering, Mumbai
LabNeuroimaging Lab, CCNY
FocusTBI · NVC · Neuroimaging Pipelines
StatusAvailable Immediately
LocationNew York · Open to Relocation
Before the MS degree · Self-directed · 2022
Neurobiology of My Subdural Hematoma
A Coursera neurobiology assignment- glimpse at my first neuroscience course
View PDF ↗

Before I enrolled in my MS, I was still working in operations, living a 'normal' life, clinically recovered after injury, but the stillness of the pandemic made it an increasingly uncomfortable baseline rather than a destination. Something was still unresolved — not in my brain, but in my understanding of what had happened to it. I had no neuroscience framework so I found a Neurobiology course on Coursera and for the assignment asking students to apply what they'd learned, I made my injury my case study. It's unpolished — and that's exactly why it's here.

I traced the neuroanatomy — the meningeal layers involved, the subcortical structures affected, how bridging vein rupture drives hematoma expansion, what each symptom, reports and scans pointed to anatomically. I drew every diagram by hand. It increased my empathy, sensitivity and my drive to educate others about it and other related neurological conditions.

That assignment is the direct precursor to everything since. It shows what I was like before any formal training — which tells you something about the kind of researcher I already was.

neuroanatomy meningeal layers self-directed hand-drawn diagrams pre-MS 24 slides
From the assignment — click to open
Slide showing meningeal layers between the skull and brain surface Slide showing a visualization of injury from reports Slide showing one of the affectedted lobe, its functions, related symptoms Slide showing probable affected area vs. observed symptom table
Open PDF ↗
My question was: Does TBI disrupt the brain's ability to regulate its own blood flow to areas of demand over the first year post-injury, if yes then where or how?
After moderate-to-severe TBI, the neurovascular system — the coupling between neural activity (measured via fALFF as a proxy) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) is seemingly disrupted. Understanding its trends longitudinally ( at 3,6,12 months post injury) and finding where that disruption lives, its significance and whether it could correlate with injury severity or observed neuropsychological assessment changes, is what my body of work is trying to answer. Research Funding: NIH NINDS, NIMHHD
Multi-Scale Neurovascular Coupling in Moderate-to-Severe TBI
Journal Manuscript — In Preparation

This Manuscript/RA work began after my work as graduate research student, with a situation where I was looking at thesis problem statement either too zoomed out or too zoomed in to see with clarity, since the hemisphere or vertex level NVC values indicating significant group differences, didn't tell me where the most NVC disruption exists or if its limited to lesioned areas, whether it follows functional network boundaries, anatomical regions, or something finer. Hence the idea of nested scales of investigation came to mind, starting broad and narrowing until the resolution can't get finer for the computing power available to me. I built end-to-end scripts for each of five scales handling pre-processing, data conversion, lesion masking, NVC calculations, group differences, FDR corrections, visualization of significant results for each.

Scale 1
Whole-brain
Single CBF-fALFF value per subject. Is the brain as a whole coupling less well after TBI?
Scale 2
Hemisphere
Left vs right separately. TBI is often asymmetric — whole-brain average hides lateralised effects.
Scale 3
Yeo-7 Networks
7 functional systems (DMN, frontoparietal, visual…). Does disruption track which system the region belongs to?
Scale 4
DKT Atlas
68 anatomical regions. If disruption follows region boundaries?
Scale 5
Vertex-wise neighborhood
20,484 points per person. 10,242 points per hemisphere. 10 nearest neighbors. Does NVC disruption have a more localized pattern?
My thesis analysed resolution scales 2 and 5. The work for manuscript runs all five resolution scales across 139 sessions, each answers a question other scales couldn't
Sessions QA-QC: 139 (TBI + controls)
Timepoints: 3, 6 & 12 months post-injury
Skills: R, Python, Matlab, Bash
Status: Manuscript in preparation
Figures, few samples
Scale description
DKT-34-roi
Scale description
DKT-68-roi
Scale description
YEO-7
Scale description
Hemispherical Asymmetry
MS Thesis: Vertex-Based CBF-fALFF Coupling in TBI — First Study at This Resolution for TBI

Mapping surface-based neurovascular coupling in moderate-to-severe TBI at hemisphere and vertex neighborhood scales. Found significant group differences bilaterally at 12 months post injury, unilaterally at 6 months post injury and a significant negative correlation with injury severity at 6 months, supporting NVC as a candidate non-invasive biomarker of neurovascular integrity post-TBI

Submitted: January 2025
Downloads: 150+ across 10 countries
Skills: R, Excel
APA Citation
Patel, V. H. (2025). Vertex-based analysis of cerebral blood flow and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (CBF-fALFF) coupling in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury during the first year post-injury [Master's thesis, The City University of New York]. CUNY Academic Works. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/6138/
ASL Pre-processing Pipeline — Engineering a Solution When the Standard One Didn't Exist
Lab Infrastructure

The standard ASL pre-processing pipeline had no scrubbing module, and available SCRUB and SCORE tools didn't fully fit our requirements for TBI outlier cohort so I architected and validated a scrubbing module in the pipeline after determining the right point for it in the pre-processing sequence, while accounting for effects on dependent pre-processing steps, intermediate inputs and outputs.

Skills: ASLtbx , SPM12 , MATLAB , Python
Sessions QC'd: 130+
What ASL measures · why it's hard · what TBI adds
CBF via ASL
Arterial spin labelling tags water in blood magnetically, lets it flow into brain tissue, subtracts labelled from control to measure cerebral blood flow. No contrast agent. But SNR is low — the signal is ~1% of background. Every source of noise matters.
Why motion is worse here
fMRI scrubs individual corrupted frames. ASL can't — CBF = control − label as a pair. Remove one frame, you corrupt the subtraction. Remove neither, the outlier CBF value contaminates everything downstream, including the NVC coupling calculation it feeds into.
TBI compounds this
Moderate-to-severe TBI patients move more during scanning. Standard motion thresholds designed for healthy adults or specific pathologies would exclude too much data, for ranges normal in TBI. The pipeline needed parameters that account for the population at the right stage of pre-processing, considering effects on dependent functions, modifications in intermediate inputs and outputs
ASL Preprocessing — What Each Stage Does and Why It's There
1
DICOM → NIfTI , Session Mapping
Raw scanner files converted to neuroimaging format ,90 volumes acquired (45 label + 45 control, interleaved)
2
Motion Realignment — must happen before scrubbing
SPM two-pass: align all 90 volumes to a stable reference mean , generates motion parameters (translation + rotation per volume) , scrubbing happens after this, not before — you can only identify which frames moved too much once you know how much they moved and that measurement is only accurate after alignment
3
TBI Motion Scrubbing Inserted — not in standard ASLtbx
Standard ASLtbx executes a batchrun() consisting of all preprocessing functions. But threshold customization needed the functions be divided into PART1, PART2 The scrubbing stage was inserted between them with population-appropriate thresholds derived from TBI-specific literature. Extreme negative value outlier volumes removed with proper changes reflected in intermediate inputs and outputs on which other pre-processing functions depend
4
Coregistration · Smoothing · Brain Masking
T1 structural scan aligned to clean ASL mean (functional → structural alignment) , Gaussian smoothing improves ASL SNR before subtraction , brain mask excludes non-brain signal that would otherwise contaminate whole-brain CBF estimates
5
CBF Quantification · MNI Normalisation
Label-control subtraction using protocol-specific acquisition parameters , T1 tissue segmentation (grey matter / white matter / CSF) for partial volume correction , normalised to MNI standard brain space using lab-specific bounding box — the toolbox default silently clips superior and inferior regions of the brain
Output per subject: wmeanCBF (MNI-space) · cmeanCBF (outlier-cleaned) · globalsg.txt (whole-brain CBF) — feeds directly into NVC analysis
Instance of inquiry into ASL Pipeline Realign step3 — Inside SPM's Two-Pass Realignment

While inserting the TBI scrubbing stage, a contested assumption surfaced in the lab: does SPM's realignment use the first volume or the mean image as its reference? The answer determined whether motion parameters would shift after volume removal — and whether the pipeline needed to re-run realignment from scratch for subjects. Rather than guessing, I traced through the full call stack with line references: batch_realign.mspm_realign_asl.mrealign_series()cleanandsave_parameters().

Pass 1 · lines 270–331
Loop starts at i=2. First volume is reference. Aligns all others to it while accumulating a running mean image.
Pass 2 · lines 334–382
Loop starts at i=1 — all volumes. Reference is now the mean (M), not volume 1. This is what makes estimates robust.
Re-centering · lines 385–391
SPM's own comment says "aligning to first image." It isn't — it's re-centering so average motion = 0. Caught by reading the matrix operations, not the misleading toolbox script comment to confirm documentation.
Function Realign() annotated flowchart↗
NVC Analysis Scripts — Five Scales end-to-end
Scale 1
Whole-Brain
Single CBF-fALFF correlation per subject, group comparisons (TBI vs HC), longitudinal change across 3, 6, 12 months, correlations with PTA severity and neuropsychological assessments.
Scale 2
Hemisphere
Left and right cortex NVC calculated separately, bilateral disruption or asymmetric, group comparisons (TBI vs HC), longitudinal change across 3, 6, 12 months, as lateralised injury effects whole-brain average, but can now be identified
Scale 3
Yeo-7 Networks
7 functional brain networks (default mode, frontoparietal, visual, etc.),identifies which network type has significant disruption and differences
Scale 4
DKT Atlas
68 anatomical regions (cortical parcellation), identifies specific anatomical loci — which ROI's are significantly affected
Scale 5
Vertex-wise
20,484 cortical points per person, with NVC computed at each vertex with customizable neighborhood size we chose 10 neighbors
139 sessions· 3 timepoints · 5 scales · one run
NVC group differences, correlation with PTA, neuropsych scores at each scale
All figures reproducible · scripts available on request
Skills: R, Python, Bash, Matlab
Non-Invasive Study of Neurovascular Coupling in Traumatic Brain Injury
Poster · RCMI 2025

Conference presentation of the thesis findings — significant bilateral NVC group differences at 12 months post-injury, unilaterally at 6 months and coupling strength negatively correlated with injury severity at 6 months. Co-authored with MA Yamin and JJ Kim. Research funded by NIH NINDS and NIMHHD.

Authors: Patel, Yamin, Kim
Research Funding: NIH NINDS · NIMHHD
APA Citation
Patel, V., Yamin, M. A., & Kim, J. J. (2025). Non-invasive study of neurovascular coupling in traumatic brain injury [Poster presentation]. RCMI 2025, New York, NY.
Poster — RCMI 2025
RCMI 2025 Poster — Non-Invasive Study of Neurovascular Coupling in TBI
Outside the lab.

CareerOS — Multi-Agent Job Search System

Prototype- in active use

CareerOS is a multi-agent job search system I built because I needed to understand my own market value, and systematically reverse engineer the mismatch I felt under a mountain of contradictory advice that no existing platform addressed to my satisfaction. The human gate in this system isn't a limitation — it's the feature that makes everything downstream trustworthy.

It scouts across 70+ job boards, ATS platforms, academic boards, government labs, and direct company careers pages — generating targeted search queries stratified by how recently the role was posted. The fit scorer cites exact phrases from each job description rather than matching keywords; every score is auditable. The eligibility screener classifies employer type using rules the job seeker specifies, even when no policy is mentioned explicitly. Market align feeds the language of liked postings back into the scout layer — the system updates what it searches for based on what the market actually wants.

The fabrication guard runs throughout. Nothing proceeds without human review at the intermediate stage. The goal was never full automation — it was knowing exactly what to delegate.

Skills: Python · prompt engineering · system design · multi-agent architecture
US FDA 510(k) Pathway — Class III Orthopaedic Implant
Self-directed · Regulatory Systems Analysis

While working in operations at a medical device manufacturer, I had visibility into the gap between what we were producing and what we needed for FDA clearance, to get that certification to expand our export opportunities. The engineering was rigorous but our regulatory pathway was not clearly mapped being a small company with limited budget and resources to spend on middlemen, consultants to get the certification done systematically. It took me some time but I understood the framework and mapped a plan for making it happen.

A 12-month master plan for FDA 510(k) clearance of a cementless total hip replacement system — three parallel tracks across four quarterly phases. QMS establishment, predicate analysis, biocompatibility strategy, FEA and worst-case selection, mechanical testing, sterilization validation, IFU, packaging, and submission. Each node in the interactive plan contains the applicable standard, SOP, dos and don'ts, and gaps identified from actual device documentation.

The gaps are real. The standards are current. The plan is designed to be handed to a team and executed.

Device class: Class III · surgical implant
Pathway: FDA 510(k) substantial equivalence
Timeline: 12 months · 4 phases · 3 parallel tracks
Standards: ISO 13485 · ISO 14971 · ISO 10993 · 21 CFR 820
The full stack of what I bring.
Neuroimaging
FreeSurfer
ASLtbx
SPM12
Vertex-wise & ROI analysis
Cortical parcellation
Programming
Python (NumPy, SciPy, Pandas,
Matplotlib, Nibabel)
R
MATLAB
Bash
Statistics
Non-parametric inference
FDR correction
Longitudinal analysis
Systems & Automation
Parallel processing
Pipeline design
Multi-agent architecture
Prompt engineering
Agent orchestration
Research
Literature review
Root cause analysis
Technical documentation
Neuroimaging QA-QC
Experimental design
Mentorship
Clinical
CITI-certified (HSR + RCR)
IRB compliance
Human subjects research
Neuropsychological assessment
Experimental design
Vaidehi Patel
Let's discuss how I can support your mission